One saves you a fortune in interest. The other gives you flexibility. The right answer depends on you, not the math.
Cal says: The 15-year wins on total interest. The 30-year wins on cash flow and optionality. There's no universally correct answer.
$400,000 loan. 15-year at 6.0%. 30-year at 6.75% (15-year rates are typically 0.5–0.75% lower).
| 15-Year | 30-Year | |
|---|---|---|
| Monthly P&I | $3,375 | $2,594 |
| Total interest paid | $207,577 | $533,898 |
| Total paid | $607,577 | $933,898 |
| Equity built in 5 years | ~$96,000 | ~$30,000 |
The 15-year saves over $326,000 in interest. But the monthly cost is $781 higher — a substantial commitment if your income drops, you have a kid, or you want to invest aggressively.
You can take the 30-year and pay it like a 15-year. Add roughly $781/month to principal on the 30-year and you'll pay it off in around 16 years.
The trade-off:
For most people who value optionality, the 30-year-paid-aggressively is the safer pick. For people with very stable incomes who'll definitely stay disciplined, the true 15-year is mathematically better.
Biweekly mortgage programs split your payment in half and bill you every two weeks. Because there are 26 biweekly periods (= 13 monthly payments) per year, you make one extra payment annually — knocking 4–6 years off a 30-year mortgage.
You can do this yourself for free: just send 1/12th extra principal each month, or one full extra payment in December. Lender-administered biweekly programs sometimes charge enrollment fees ($300–$500) or per-payment fees — skip those and DIY it.
Pick the 15-year if: stable two-income household, retirement savings already on track, want the discipline of a contractual obligation, plan to stay 10+ years.
Pick the 30-year if: single income, kids on the way, building emergency fund, comfortable with self-discipline on extra payments, want the lower required payment as insurance against the unknown.
Run both scenarios in our mortgage calculator with your actual numbers before deciding.
Related reading